+56.4%
reported AI incident increase in 2024
Stanford HAI reported 233 AI-related incidents in 2024, a record high. SourceLock is built for teams adding AI output to public content.
Stanford HAI AI Index 2025Marketing claim governance
Apex Blue SourceLock
Put every public claim on a source-backed review path.
Claim console
Scan public copy, review risky claims, and turn approved language into reusable truth.
SourceLock helps teams review public language, attach supporting proof, record accountable decisions, and turn approved facts into a reusable truth library for people, partners, and AI-assisted publishing.
Juris helps teams review, verify, and govern public claims. Juris is not a lawyer, does not replace counsel, and does not guarantee regulatory compliance.
Single-link scans
Website crawls
Paste-copy review
Juris review
Claim lock active
pricing
verify exclusions
reviews
check count date
guarantee
needs boundary
service area
confirm scope
SourceLock Risk Check
See which public claims deserve proof before a buyer sees them.
Enter one public page. Juris will return up to three priority claims, why each one matters, and the proof your team should gather before relying on it.
One public page per check
Up to three priority findings
No account required
This automated review identifies claims worth checking. It is not legal advice, does not decide whether a statement is accurate or lawful, and does not guarantee compliance.
Market Signals
The public web is becoming a claim-risk surface.
These figures come from outside sources, not Apex Blue projections. They point to the same operational reality: AI output, reviews, testimonials, pricing language, and public promises need stronger source discipline before they ship.
sourced
$12.5B
reported consumer fraud losses in 2024
FTC data shows reported fraud losses rose 25% year over year. SourceLock treats public promises as business-risk surface area.
Federal Trade Commission38%
fraud reporters who said they lost money
The FTC reported that loss-rate among fraud reporters moved from 27% in 2023 to 38% in 2024, making claim discipline a trust issue.
Federal Trade Commission42%
consumers who trust reviews like personal recommendations
BrightLocal found review trust has cooled, which makes testimonial accuracy, context, and source evidence more important.
BrightLocal Local Consumer Review Survey 2025Claim Governance
The problem is not publishing faster. It is knowing what should be trusted.
AI-generated content, agency edits, ad variations, testimonials, pricing blocks, and local service pages can drift away from what the business can prove. SourceLock turns that drift into a review queue with supporting proof, clear decisions, and a lasting history.
pricing language
reviews and review counts
testimonials
guarantees
licensing and insurance
certifications and awards
service areas
response times
years in business
performance and comparison claims
financing language
regulated-sensitive claims
How It Works
A review workflow that moves from public copy to approved truth.
01
Collect the public surface
Review one public page, map a website, or paste ad, social, blog, email, or AI-assisted copy before it reaches buyers.
single pagewebsite reviewpasted copy
02
Extract source-sensitive claims
Juris looks for factual, buyer-facing, and regulated-sensitive claims across pricing, reviews, guarantees, service areas, response times, financing, and more.
15 categoriesreview prioritiesproof guidance
03
Approve, edit, or decline
Approved and corrected claims become reusable truth. Declined claims become prohibited rules for writers, contractors, and AI agents.
approved truthscorrectionsprohibited rules
04
Export the truth repository
Give approved teams, agencies, contractors, and publishing tools a secure, current library of language they can use with confidence.
secure sharingapproved languagecurrent guidance
Product Depth
Built for teams that publish where trust matters.
Use SourceLock before launching service pages, pricing pages, review sections, paid ads, AI-assisted articles, sales enablement copy, and partner-produced content. The goal is practical governance: catch unsupported claims early, keep good claims source-backed, and give every publishing partner the same truth.
Core
monthly monitoring
Pro
weekly monitoring
Command
daily monitoring
Claim review queue
Every claim keeps its public location, exact excerpt, review priority, recommendation, and decision history. Supporting proof stays attached as a separate record.
Changed-page monitoring
Recurring website reviews focus attention on pages that changed, so your team can catch truth drift without repeatedly reviewing the same language.
Usage protection
Clear plan allowances and confirmation before unusually large reviews help your team control scope and avoid surprises.
Billing and activation
Choose a plan that matches your publishing pace, manage billing securely, and keep your review history when your needs change.
Review Boundaries
Serious claim review without pretending to be counsel.
SourceLock gives operators a repeatable way to govern brand truth. It does not give legal advice, replace qualified professionals, or promise regulatory outcomes.
Every claim keeps its public location and exact excerpt separate from the supporting proof used to verify it.
Approved and edited claims become brand truths that writers and AI agents can reuse.
Declined claims become prohibited truth rules so similar language can be flagged elsewhere.
Secure, expiring share links give approved partners current guidance without full workspace access.
Apex Blue SourceLock
Give every public claim a source, a status, and an owner.
SourceLock gives teams one working system for claim reviews, supporting proof, accountable decisions, reusable truth, recurring monitoring, and secure sharing.